In a new, and very interesting study, 207 children with ADHD were recruited at 6 to 12 years old, and then followed until they were 41 years old. At 41, 59 of them received brain mRI’s, which were compared to a group of men who did not have ADHD. what they did was measure thickness of the cerebral cortex, the crucial part of the brain that has the largest concentration of nerve cells, often known as “matter”. The results were as follows:
1) Men who had ADHD as children had a lower overall thickness of the cortex than a comparison group, whether they still had ADHD or not.
2) Men who had ADHD as children had thinner cortex in several areas related to attention, including the parietal and temporal lobes, but not in the frontal lobes, which are the areas most commonly cited as deficient in ADHD. these areas had more to do with emotional regulation than cognitive processes.
3) Almost all adults had been treated with stimulants such as Ritalin, for an average of 2.2 years. this apparently made little difference in brain development.
4) Those men whose ADHD resolved had less differences in other areas, including the occipital lobe, than those whose ADHD did not resolve. the authors felt this may reflect a way the brain “compensates” for weaknesses in certain areas.
What can we make out of all of this? first of all, that there are some clear differences in brain patterns of adults who were diagnosed with ADHD as children compared to those who did not have ADHD as children. More interestingly, these differences were there whether or not the men still had symptoms of ADHD, so it may be that these differences in cortex size don’t have much to do with how children with ADHD develop, grow, and succeed. Also, for what it is worth, stimulants did not affect this process overall. However, they might not have been taken long enough to do so. One wonders why stimulants were only taken for about 2 years. (side-effects, no longer needed? parental preferences? children’s preference? )
In a way, this study brings up more new questions than it answers, but thisis how it often goes with good science…
MRI long term study 2011